Skip to content
Home » Rural Utility Cooperative Posts » Page 15

Rural Utility Cooperative Posts

Guest Post: A Guide to Surety Bonds in the Energy and Utility Sectors

This guest post was provided by Danielle Rodabaugh, chief editor of the Surety Bond Insider.

In most cases, surety bond insurance is used to protect consumers from companies that could harm them by committing fraud or failing to follow industry regulations. In some situations, however, bonds can be used to protect a business itself. Such is the case with utility bonds used within the energy and utility sector.Read More »Guest Post: A Guide to Surety Bonds in the Energy and Utility Sectors

Electric Coop vs. Power Supplier: Feuding PPA Parties Illustrate “Real Life” Disputes Involving Common PPA Provisions

A 2008 case and its follow-up in 2011 addressed several issues arising from common provisions in power purchase agreements.  These issues involve spinning reserve requirements, dispatch rights, and the applicable heat rate formula.  The underlying dispute emphasizes the need to clearly address the parties’ bargain in the power purchase agreement (PPA), preferably with the input of the parties’ legal counsel.Read More »Electric Coop vs. Power Supplier: Feuding PPA Parties Illustrate “Real Life” Disputes Involving Common PPA Provisions

State of Renewable Energy Financing for Coops

This post is a repost from CFC’s Solutions News Bulletin, Sept. 24, 2012, Vol. 14, No. 36.

At the September board meeting of the National Renewables Cooperative Organization (NRCO), John List, CFC senior vice president, Member Services, discussed the funding behind current and future renewable energy projects. The regularly scheduled meeting was hosted by Indianapolis, Ind.-based Wabash Valley Power.Read More »State of Renewable Energy Financing for Coops

Cooperative Litigation Update: N.C. Court Rules on Coop’s Discounting Program

In another lawsuit concerning cooperatives’ capital credit practices, a North Carolina trial court ruled in favor of a cooperative that we previously wrote about in another blog post.

The court ruled, based on the facts at issue, that the cooperative had no fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs, which were a group of deceased members’ estates.  In addition, it declared that the cooperative had authority to adopt a procedure for retiring deceased members’ capital credits on an accelerated and discounted basis.  However, it expressly did not rule on whether the cooperative, in practice, properly discounted the capital credits.   In other words, the court reserved judgment on the specific manner of discounting the particular capital credits at issue in this case. Read More »Cooperative Litigation Update: N.C. Court Rules on Coop’s Discounting Program