Skip to content
Home » Public Procurement » Page 2

Public Procurement

Ga. Supreme Court Interprets Intent and Scope of Atlanta’s OCIP

Read the opinion here: Case – ArcherWestern v Pitts

Construction owners occasionally use an Owner Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) to insure personal and property damage on their projects.  The Georgia Supreme Court recently interpreted the City of Atlanta’s OCIP for construction of the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport.  After a sub-subcontractor’s employee was killed on the project, his estate sued the City of Atlanta and several contractors, alleging that they failed to ensure the subcontractor at fault maintained the level of insurance required by the OCIP program.  Instead of the required $10,000,000 in bodily-injury coverage, the subcontractor at fault maintained only $1,000,000 in coverage. Read More »Ga. Supreme Court Interprets Intent and Scope of Atlanta’s OCIP

E-Verify Law’s Unintended Exclusion for Small Public Employers’ Contractors

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution recently reported on an unintended exclusion contained in the 2011 E-Verify Law for contractors of small public owners (called “public employers”).  Those interviewed by the AJC, including a state legislator and representatives of the Georgia Municipal Association, believe that the law was not intended to exclude contractors of small public employers. Read More »E-Verify Law’s Unintended Exclusion for Small Public Employers’ Contractors

Local Government’s Multi-Year Contract Held Valid in Supreme Court Opinion

In a previous AHC Construction Law Update, we discussed a Court of Appeals opinion that held a school district’s construction contract was not void because it did not violate constitutional or statutory prohibitions against multi-year contracts.  The Supreme Court of Georgia recently vacated the part of that opinion that has created confusion among public owners’ counsel. Read More »Local Government’s Multi-Year Contract Held Valid in Supreme Court Opinion

Recovery of County’s Ultra Vires Payments

At some point, a county’s board or administrators may be faced with complaints from the community about payments made to a private entity. Members of the community (or competitors of the payee) may raise a number of complaints, including:

• payments were made to a friend of a commissioner,
• payments were made without a valid contract,
• the contract was not properly recorded,
• the contract was not effectively approved, or
• the county failed to comply with public works bidding laws.Read More »Recovery of County’s Ultra Vires Payments

Considerations in Public Owner and Governmental Energy Efficiency Projects

Public owners, such as state agencies, cities and counties, and school districts, are considering the advantages of energy efficiency projects.  The advantages include goodwill in the community, environmental benefits, and utility cost savings.  Such projects can involve an array of legal, engineering, technical, and financial issues.  This article addresses a number of considerations that, if not addressed early on, can bring unwanted surprises. Read More »Considerations in Public Owner and Governmental Energy Efficiency Projects

Impact of the 2011 Illegal Immigration Law on Public Owners

In the 2011 Regular Session, the Georgia General Assembly enacted the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011.  The purpose of the Act was to increase compliance — and punish non-compliance — with the federal E-Verify program.  The Act specifically imposes obligations on state and local governmental units (“Public Owners”) that contract for the “physical performance of services.”  The effective date for most of the provisions relevant to public owners is July 1, 2011.

A prior AHC Construction Law Alert discussed the 2010 and 2006 revisions to Georgia law governing employment verification.  The Act imposes additional requirements on public owners and provides additional clarity to existing provisions.

Read More »Impact of the 2011 Illegal Immigration Law on Public Owners